Home » Featured, Headline, Real Estate Scrapbook, knowledge is strength

Beware of the Planter areas & Bay windows!!!

3 January 2010 13 Comments

If you may have noticed, new developments always come with big planter areas, bay windows as well as aircon ledge. Why are they so popular with the developers?

Bay windows are raised window ledges and not part of the floor slab, while planter areas are literally ‘planter boxes below the floor slab area’ to encourage planting growing in the residential projects. Though these 2 features are considered part of the strata areas, they are not really that useable area. There are some cases that people even deck over the planter areas to make the area useable, without realizing that is actually not legitimate!!!.

You will wonder why these features are incorporated so widely in many new projects. It is because the spaces of planter areas, bay windows and aircon ledge are not considered Gross Floor Area (GFA) in the eye of authority, therefore the developer is maximizing their profit to sell them as accessory parcel as part of the strata areas.

Realizing the loophole, URA has issued new ruling on 7 Jul 2007 to effectively removed Bay Windows and Planter areas from the exempted list of GFA which took effect from 1 Jan 2009. However there are many projects which have made their submission earlier would be exempted from it. And many of them are  launching in this period just to make sure they will be exempted from this ruling.

Therefore in shopping for a resale unit of different ages, it is worthwhile paying attention to the quantum of the bay window and planter areas in the unit. For older projects, the strata area given normally is reflective of the actual site provision. However for the newer projects, the strata area in terms of useability is not what you will be getting physically. Therefore there have been many buyers commenting to me why two projects of same strata areas yet different age will appear to be different. This is because the accessory parcel such as bay window and planter areas are doing the trick.

There are some development units with accessory parcels as high as more than 20% of the total strata area. Imagine if you are paying for one million for a unit, $200k goes to the planter areas, bay window and aircon ledge. Can you feel the pinch?

Bay window loophole slammed shut by URA

(SINGAPORE) Here’s some bad news for developers: a loophole that helped them sell in excess of the gross floor area (GFA) has been plugged.

Till now, bay windows and planter boxes, which often make up around 5 per cent of a condo’s saleable area, had been exempted from GFA calculations. But in providing them to buyers, developers had been charging buyers for them.

This exemption will no longer apply from Oct 7, according to a circular issued by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) on Monday.

The exemption has led to ‘unintended and undesirable consequences’ and ‘unwittingly shifted market behaviours and negated the objective of the GFA exemptions for these building features’, URA said in explaining why bay windows and planter boxes will no longer be exempted from GFA.

Explaining the impact of the new rules on residential developers, a property industry player said: ‘Developers’ profit margins will be reduced because they will no longer enjoy this benefit of not counting bay windows and planter boxes as part of their GFA and yet selling this space to home buyers. If the developers want to have these features, they will have to pay the full price since these will be included as GFA.’

The new rules apply to all residential developments – landed and non- landed – and are expected to lead to a rush of new development applications, especially from developers who have bought land recently.

URA said bay windows have been ‘found to have contributed significantly to the building bulk, affect the design of buildings and generally do not encourage energy efficiency‘. ‘Often the provision of bay windows is intended mainly to increase the saleable strata area,’ it noted.

Planter boxes were introduced to provide ‘vertical greenery’ in condos and create ‘visual relief to our high-density living environment’. However, feedback and URA’s investigations have revealed extensive unauthorised conversions of planter boxes within residential units for use as a balcony space or an extension of the living room instead. The planning authority said it has also received feedback that condo owners are unhappy that they are not allowed to convert planter boxes – which are part of their strata space and which they paid for when they bought their unit – to other uses.

‘URA will leave it to the developers and building owners to decide if they wish to continue to provide bay windows and planter boxes for their residential developments so long as these building features are counted as GFA. The industry will have a free hand to design and provide these building features based on their commercial considerations as there will no longer be restrictions on the size of bay windows and planter boxes,’ URA said.

Planter boxes within non-residential developments (like hotels and business parks), as well as those located within the common areas of residential developments like sky terraces, will continue to be exempted from GFA as these areas are typically well-planted and maintained by the management corporation for the benefit of all occupants in a development.

Only formal development applications (which exclude outline applications) with a valid provisional permission issued before Oct 7 will continue to be evaluated under the old GFA guidelines. For approved developments, bay windows and planters will remain GFA-exempted until the buildings are redeveloped, URA added.

Knight Frank managing director Tan Tiong Cheng had an alternative suggestion for URA. ‘Instead of just removing GFA exemption for bay windows and planters, URA could have let the exemption continue but require developers to specify and identify these features in their sales brochures so that buyers know exactly how much of their strata area is taken up by bay windows and planter boxes. Buyers can then decide whether these features are as attractive to them.’

DTZ executive director Ong Choon Fah observed that bay windows can be a useable area – for sitting, keeping books or displaying photo frames, for instance. ‘Planter boxes, on the other hand, often end up not being used for the purpose they were meant for,’ she added.

Summing up the change, a seasoned industry observer said: ‘This closes one loophole for developers. They’ve had a good run on it.’

Kalpana Rashiwala

Thu, Jul 10, 2008
The Business Times

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

13 Comments »

  • Kelly said:

    Thanks for the write up. I will pay attention to the area take up of planter boxes n bay window for my new house purchase. The developer must be making lots of money…..

  • keithyip said:

    Thanks. Happy that u enjoy the article

  • Dan said:

    The cost will ultimately pass to the buyer if the development is to keep the same margins.

    So whether GFA include BW and planters or not, the prices will be raised accordingly to reflect this.

    It’s still a ZERO SUM game for the buyer.
    e.g.
    before new ruling, 1000sf (800sf usable) priced at $850K
    After new ruling, 1000sf (950sf usable) prized at $1000K.

  • keithyi1 said:

    Agree. However with the change of ruling in exempting bay windows and planters, at least all the developers will not rush in to provide these less-efficient or redundant features to the units.

  • keithyip said:

    I would say the profit margin of developers in 2004 to 2005s were very high then, with relatively low land cost and construction. Still pretty fat margin now, however has been thinned by higher financing cost (with risk factor considered) and high land cost and construction. Of course, some good developers have been able to pass down the cost to the buyers if they are able to market the projects well….

  • Tan said:

    Is this apply to HDB flat also ? Like DBSS. I saw alot of DBSS got big balcony.

  • raymondtan said:

    thanks for the info..already knew it years back

  • keithyip said:

    @Tan: DBBS is subject to the URA GFA ruling as private projects are. But it is good to note that URA has removed the GFA waiver on planter & bay window. But as Dan say, the break-even cost for developers will be increased therefore the selling price.

  • Tan said:

    I see.tks for the information.So actual the Space for a DBSS indicate the area in metre square like 90 will be smaller with planter, baywindow.

  • Keith Yip said:

    DBBS in many ways are similar to private developments, except they are ‘hybrid’ in a way that they are under the HDB regulations while working in an equally competitive housing market.

  • Cialis said:

    3rPLnk Excellent article, I will take note. Many thanks for the story!

  • Pixel said:

    Interesting article. I have a query about Sky@11 Condo, they seem to have bay windows, planters as well as many balconies. Do you think they were excluded from the 2007 ruling? When I visited the site the rooms seem rather small given the square footage.

    Thanks.

  • keith yip said:

    Sky 11 is exempted from 2007 ruling. Therefore what you are seeing the bay windows and planters are not counted as gfa:)

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.